The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 nad 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts indicate the proportion of the population owning a computer over an 8-year period and compare computer ownership by education level in 2002 and 2010.
Looking at the first bar graph in detail, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the computer ownership. More specifically, in 2002, well under 60% of the population had a computer. The figure subsequently experienced a period of slight growth and finished at about 70% in 2010.
Besides this, the second graph reveals that the higher education people had, the larger the rate of computer owners was. The percentage of post...
- In some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of the cities and into regional areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 70
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous generation.Why is this the case? What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people? 90
- Some people believe that secondary school children should study international news as a subject Other say that this is wasting time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 90
- Modern technology allows machines to perform the hard work instead of humans. Does this have a positive or a negative effect on people? Give your own opinion and examples. 80
Sentence: Looking at the first bar grahp in detail, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the computer ownership.
Error: grahp Suggestion: graph
Sentence: It is also intesting to note that the rates for all the six categories under study increased between 2002 and 2010.
Error: intesting Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 797 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.801 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.646 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.804 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.419 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.579 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.035 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4