On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the

While the Council ought to reduce the number of mopeds which are rented. It is concise that council of Balmar wants to increase the safety of the pedestrians. But as per given evidence and information argument does not seem cogent, It is rife with holes and assumptions and before taking any action council should reconcile the argument and should investigate properly.

People often use the vehicle as a result of technology to itinerant. Balmar is no exception, Mopeds may be the popular form of transportation in Balmar. But due to lack of other vehicles mopeds is popular among people or for traveling shorter distance people often use mopeds. Mentioning just population increases to 100,000 are seriously doubting the authority of the statement. For such a statement one should provide some authority affirmation like a survey conducted by the government to count the population. It is not sufficient to provide just an abstract statement regarding the population of the island. Rather, tempting by such statements council should scrutinize the argument.

Secondly, Author has stated that a number of accidents can be reduced by the decline in renting the vehicle. But, This flawed statement does not clearly reveal the severity of accidents. If Severity of accidents is high then only actions taken by the government worth it. On the contrary, If accidents are not that much sever than wasting time in implementing such a method is not justifiable. By citing that rental company should be reduced rented vehicle during summer author implicitly predicted that perilous accidents occur in summer. And implementing the strategy for summer only may not achieve many goals.

And Last but not the least, This whole suggestion is utterly based on the success of the similar strategy of Seaville island. The Author has assumed that by implementing the same technique as Seavile pernicious accidents can be eliminated. But the success of that island is also under the question mark. There is no such evidence that emphasizes the success of the similar strategy of Seavile island. There is no such survey or document stated in the argument. It is clearly based on some words utter by random people. Author has not much investigated into this issue. The author is haughty in making the judgment. This type of crucial decisions cannot be made by some flawed argument which is driven by assumptions.

The Author is judicious and has a concern for the safety of the people. If there is some possibility of reducing such accidents council should implement such strategy but after careful observation and with firm evidence. Decisions should not be driven by such flawed arguments. Before restricting rental companies to reduce their one-day rent vehicles to 25 they should meticulously examine argument and Seavile for their success regarding this strategy.

Votes
Average: 2.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
While the Council ought to reduce the number ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ng just population increases to 100,000 are seriously doubting the authority of the statement. For suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'statements'' or 'statement's'?
Suggestion: statements'; statement's
...of the island. Rather, tempting by such statements council should scrutinize the argument....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...early reveal the severity of accidents. If Severity of accidents is high then only...
^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'accidents'' or 'accident's'?
Suggestion: accidents'; accident's
...re is some possibility of reducing such accidents council should implement such strategy ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, as a result, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 16.3942115768 177% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 2260.96107784 106% => OK
No of words: 461.0 441.139720559 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20607375271 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75596849413 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468546637744 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3570744521 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7586206897 119.503703932 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8965517241 23.324526521 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.24137931034 5.70786347227 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210927252541 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536170159922 0.0743258471296 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497666436215 0.0701772020484 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118541459043 0.128457276422 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435310968798 0.0628817314937 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.3799401198 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 98.500998004 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

--------------------
argument 1 -- not OK

argument 2 -- not OK

argument 3 -- not OK
--------------------

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 29 15
No. of Words: 461 350
No. of Characters: 2348 1500
No. of Different Words: 216 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.634 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.093 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.682 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 201 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 135 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.897 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.579 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.517 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.25 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.447 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5