Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.

Leadership is the most essential skill among all the skills. Good leadership will lead to great and auspicious future in any organization. A leader should always be audacious enough to make decisions. As many organizations choose their leaders through demographic method. After certain years as a leader, one should step down as a leader and should give chance to other individuals. A perennial leader will give a feel of hegemony. There should be some predefined time for any representative of any organization. It is clear and unambiguous that leader should have to step down as representative after some time for better growth of an organization.

As New representative is in action new and innovative ideas implemented. Old, paradox and dormant system will again become active. Few old ideas can be also good but they can also be represented in more elaborate and with some little change. It is a necessity to revitalize old system with utterly different and more creative ideas. For that purpose only after every 5 years election is conducted in India with a hope that new leader will come with better and more creative ideas. Democratic system will always choose a better person to lead them.

As in democratic system public choose leaders. Any representative who gave the best shot in predefined time will evidently be chosen again by people. But for ones as an individual person should have to step down from that prestigious position. People always optimistic about their future and hence they will choose who is appropriate at that time. With single domineering leader, the system had become single-minded opinion-which is of course of leader’s. Ramifications of leader’s work will reflect in future. For instance, Barack Obama had elected as a president several times in his carrier because of his great work and service to the people of USA.

And lastly, Revitalization create a positive impact on candidates or the competitor as they are also considered and given chance. Every candidate will have a feeling of equanimity with this approach. No one is superior over other, every candidate has given a fair chance to prove themselves to become a leader. As they have some planes in mind for future and this plans can help to improvise the condition of the organization. For instance, One can consider biased opinion if Mr. Trump don't get chance to prove himself. And maybe he has a better plan than the previous president. Hence, after juxtaposing both the sides this can be concluded that revitalization of any enterprise is through the change in leadership.

It is unshakably agreeable that every rival of leader should get fair chance to compete and every leader should step down after some predefined time period. If as a individual work is good than one can again be selected by the people. But for ones, one should step down as a representative. It is the clearly debatable topic but more elegant and agreeable that one should abdicate from the leadership position after some predefined time period equal to 5 years.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... be audacious enough to make decisions. As many organizations choose their leaders...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...choose a better person to lead them. As in democratic system public choose lead...
^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ions of leader's work will reflect in future. For instance, Barack Obama had elected...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 487, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...an consider biased opinion if Mr. Trump dont get chance to prove himself. And maybe ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...down after some predefined time period. If as a individual work is good than one c...
^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...fter some predefined time period. If as a individual work is good than one can ag...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, may, so, for instance, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2554.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05742574257 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92438041032 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451485148515 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 838.8 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7421142408 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8125 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.78125 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9375 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185587846788 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053824770346 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628422370572 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113680880544 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055171093745 0.0667264976115 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.