In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the modern world, transportation is a very crucial part of society and countries. A lot of people travel using a lot of types of transportations for many different needs. Some people have business trips, others go to a vacation to a warm country, thirds visit their relatives in nearby cities, and others just use but to gets to work. Whether or not you should spend money on new, fast types of transportation is dependant on a lot of factors such as geographical location, amount of money available, types of existing transportation methods and etc. I think doing both things has its advantages and disadvantages.
Lets say some town decides to build a new railway line to another city. They should do it if it makes sense and there is demand for a quick transportation between those cities, otherwise it doesn't make sense to build a transportation method which no one will use, it will be a waste of money. Second thing in building a new form of transportation is that it will require a lot of money, and there is no other better places to invest it. To sum up, building a new method of transportation is risky and should be done with caution. On the other hand, improving existing methods of transportationis less risky, because first of all, there is an exicting base which you can improve, no need to build everything from scratch. Secondly, it would cost way less to upgrade something, rather than building something from nothing meaning that it will be less risky to the people who're upgrading it. Thirdly I think people would apreciate things they are familiar with being improved and modified.
Finally, I think you should improve existing transport as it is less risky, time and money consuming and it all depends on a situation and if there is a certain need, buidding new transportation is also right.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- Would you before to go to a small university in the countryside or a large university in the city 91
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
- The charts below show how selected age groups purchased concert, cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2006 in three countries and how the internet was accessed. 87
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1994. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...g a lot of types of transportations for many different needs. Some people have business trips,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...nd others just use but to gets to work. Whether or not you should spend money on new, fast typ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...on new, fast types of transportation is dependant on a lot of factors such as geographica...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 546, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ypes of existing transportation methods and etc. I think doing both things has its advan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... has its advantages and disadvantages. Lets say some town decides to build a new r...
^^^^
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and disadvantages. Lets say some town decides to build a new railway line to a...
^^
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tion between those cities, otherwise it doesnt make sense to build a transportation me...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, i think, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76265822785 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91885909618 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2116667542 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275480020667 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974927295215 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375455408807 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186079134962 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030533007284 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.