Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animal s in captivity, for instance in zoos. Other people say that there are benefits for the animals and for humans. Discuss both sides of this debate, and give your personal view.

Animate being is an inseparable component of the universe and there is a controversial matter concerning animals. Some people consider that it is purely incorrect that certain creature’s freedom is confined in zoos. However, others believe that it is useful for both animals and humanity. There are valid argumemts and thaughts which will be discuss in this essay.

On the one hand, there have some reasons that why they should not keep in cage. Firstly, beast are lose their charactdristic and ability for natural survival which effect on their hunting skill as they tend to get their feeding readily. Secondly, eco-cycle or food-cycle of forest may affected because normal life style is being interrupted by humans such as breeding and eating pattern. Lastly, many environmentalist says that put vertebrate in cage is unfair as their freedom are compromised as they have to live in bondage territory where they feel annoyed and irritated. For example, Lion and other animal kept in cage and hit them by hunter while they trained by their trainer. As a result, they loss their wild characteristic and become dependant on human being.

On the other hand, accumaulating wild bodies in zoos have some benefits. Firstly, scientist can research some medical treatment on animals instead of humans because in experimenting, have heavy risk of losing life sometimes. Secondly, zoos and circus organization can be a medium or source of income which may be invest for stray animal awareness and sustainity as well as selling of animals can be reduced. Lastly, some extinct species can be preserved for next generation where they might be explore variety of species underone roof. Moreover, new generation get experience the diversity of different breed. For instance, some group who are nearest to endangered such as rhino and bengal tiger are protected by zoos and try to increase their population. As a result, sanctuarys are provide better knowledge about wildlife.

Having inspected both aspects, It appers to me that, It could have some advantages of holding animals in zoos. However, It should be highlighted that their natural apperance would be lost as they are dependant on zoos profession.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lost'.
Suggestion: lost
...ld not keep in cage. Firstly, beast are lose their charactdristic and ability for na...
^^^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...ss their wild characteristic and become dependant on human being. On the other hand, a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or stray animal awareness and sustainity as well as selling of animals can be red...
^^
Line 5, column 786, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...population. As a result, sanctuarys are provide better knowledge about wildlife. Hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...ral apperance would be lost as they are dependant on zoos profession.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'zoos'' or 'zoo's'?
Suggestion: zoos'; zoo's
... would be lost as they are dependant on zoos profession.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21408450704 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80967241428 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571830985915 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.386133682 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4210526316 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213191123964 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677538605534 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628783824059 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141097574686 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06549836322 0.056905535591 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.