Some people think that radio has been out of date, and there is no need to listen to the radio for entertainment and news. Do you agree or disagree?
With rapid transformation of technologies, many youngsters prefer the latest high-tech devices including smartphones and tablets to radio so as to acquire the daily need information. Some advocate that the role of radio is going to decline, while in my view, the significance of radio is irreplaceable no matter how powerful other latest devices are.
It is irrefutable that modern technological tools have several obvious benefits. The first consideration is that the internet can supply its surfers with pictures and videos whereas radio only provides its listeners with sound. CNN and BBC websites, for instance, helps readers have deeper understandings and vivid views about live events through their not only online articles but also embedded clips. Another reason is that television channels broadcasts a variety of well-devised shows with higher quality of sound than that of radio and images with high resolution, ranging from drama, comedy movies and cartoons which can attract different age groups.
However, I believe that radio still has several features that other media can never replace. The first merit is that radio can reach a wider range of audiences, especially people who are in remote areas and mountainous regions. In fact, radio signals can be transferred in a longer distance than other signals including mobile signals due to its physical characteristics. Another plus point is that many elderly people tend to use radio as a means of acquiring information and listening to music. In fact, many old people find it hard to make use of modern equipment including smartphones and tablets and thus, they are likely to stick to their old ways for entertainment and reading news via the usage of radio.
In conclusion, while I argue that there are great plus points of the internet and televisions, the importance of radio is also worth being acknowledged due to its undeniable benefits for users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-27 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | cactuss5 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-22 | xommi_ | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | milad_salehi2002 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-16 | ntphuc0101 | 95 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 63
- Water resources around the world are falling deficient Analyze the possible reasons and provide your suggestions 93
- Some people think that radio has been out of date and there is no need to listen to the radio for entertainment and news Do you agree or disagree 95
- It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry has negative effects on individuals nations and the globe To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- Environmental problems are serious many countries It means that the only possible way to protect the environment is at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree on this hypothesis 98
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...luding smartphones and tablets to radio so as to acquire the daily need information. Som...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which can attract different age groups. However, I believe that radio still has ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, thus, well, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26948051948 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86176389882 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3892715238 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234413381612 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821385456936 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483332588598 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131878375702 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550963883262 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.