The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work by the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.
It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who went and will go to work by car and by train is quite similar. In contrast, the pattern of bus travelers tends to decrease slowly.
In 1970, the amount of commuters travelling by car, bus and train was 2, 4 and 5 millions respectively. After 10 years, only bus commuters remained exactly the 1970’s number while the others increased insignificantly. Over a period of 20 years, approximate 7 millions people drove car to work when there were just 3 millions caught train to work although both the pattern of car and train grew considerably in 2000. However, the number of people who traveled by bus kept slowly fall at the same time.
In 2015, both amounts of bus and train travelers reached about 3.5 millions with a fast jump of train and a keep-going slight drop of bus. Between 2015 and 2030, experts predicts that the number of car and train commuters will keep climb up without a fall. Particularly, train’s pattern will go straight up and reach a peak of about 5 millions people whereas there will be up to 9 millions car travelers. On the other hand, there will be less and less people go to work by bus which is come down to the level of 3 millions in 2030.
The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work by the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.
It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who went and will go to work by car and by train is quite similar. In contrast, the pattern of bus travelers tends to decrease slowly.
In 1970, the amount of commuters travelling by car, bus and train was 2, 4 and 5 millions respectively. After 10 years, only bus commuters remained exactly the 1970’s number while the others increased insignificantly. Over a period of 20 years, approximate 7 millions people drove car to work when there were just 3 millions caught train to work although both the pattern of car and train grew considerably in 2000. However, the number of people who traveled by bus kept slowly fall at the same time.
In 2015, both amounts of bus and train travelers reached about 3.5 millions with a fast jump of train and a keep-going slight drop of bus. Between 2015 and 2030, experts predicts that the number of car and train commuters will keep climb up without a fall. Particularly, train’s pattern will go straight up and reach a peak of about 5 millions people whereas there will be up to 9 millions car travelers. On the other hand, there will be less and less people go to work by bus which is come down to the level of 3 millions in 2030.
- It is clear that there’s extreme contrary in the variations of the two values over the first decade of the 21st century. While more and more money was spent on cell phone service, landline phone, on the other hand, shows a tendency of steady decrease.Th 78
- The pie charts above compare figures of the population age of Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and estimations on those statistics in 2050.It is clear from the graphs that the people of the between 15 and 59 in the two countries account for a large propor 73
- The line chart above compares the number of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden, and America.It is clear from the chart that the three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. 78
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work with the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who want and will go 73
- The line chart above illustrates the population proportion at the age of 65 and beyond of Japan, Sweden and the USA in a-hundred-year time from 1940 to 2040.It is clear that the population aged 65 and above ratio of Sweden and the USA shows around 50% sim 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above gives information on the figure f...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 453, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the other hand, there will be less and less people go to work by bus which is come ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54296875 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57539806067 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53515625 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7329838236 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.727272727 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353670292817 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154159931956 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.200939840043 0.0843802449381 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315469996303 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.245678926605 0.0819641961636 300% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.