Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general
Recently, the phenomenon of new technological advancement and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of developing new applications is highly beneficial for people’s life and work, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of technology can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, advance technology and their wide applications can provide the people with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of promoting awareness about the different culture, as well as increasing efficiency of the work, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of technology on people lifestyle. Thus, beneficial ramifications of advance technology in both increasing efficiency and making life easier apparently can be seen.
From a realm of science, new gadget of the technology might increase the consequences of sedentary lifestyle. Moreover, fundamental aspects of abundant applications could relate to this reality that the demerits of sedentary pertain to health issues. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the technology is correlated negatively with increasing the health risk. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the advance technology far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of connecting people around the world prove the significance of promoting brotherhood and culture intolerance, but also pinpoint practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | edsonsimoes | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- University only requires applying digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 83
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76388888889 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34095627205 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9770153994 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12246915328 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444080003013 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368335757834 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726470976276 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450718569565 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.