Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general
recently, new technological development in regards to society has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of new technological development in society?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is a boom for society, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social perspective standpoint, recent innovations are bound up inextricably with technology, which indicates they lead to both human convenience and better life. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between medical investigation and scientific research as well as an exponential increase in illness treatment. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of modern society is correlated positively with not only electronic device but also software application.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, technological achievement attribute to stressful life, in that it would come down to mental disorder, deep depression, and severe anxiety. A salient example of such attribution is internet, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take time saving for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint air pollution and environmental degradation problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to nature hazard, global warming, and even human contact. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of nature preservation and psychological well-being.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the benefits of technological development are outweigh its drawbacks. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recently
recently, new technological development in regar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...recently, new technological development in regards to society has sparked an ongoing controve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the social perspective standpoint, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ice but also software application. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion and psychological well-being. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 25, column 193, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...nefits of technological development are outweigh its drawbacks. However, with the benefi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89898989899 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34592052579 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690235690236 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8356633504 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.769230769 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172455929632 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448376850607 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700895042588 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102401628202 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848613789575 0.0609392437508 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 55.0591133005 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.