The three different charts illustrate information about the contribution of students of various economic background in 1991, the total population of undergraduates in the British university and financial support by government between 1991 and 2001.
In the beginning, University had approximately one million students and the governmental spendings on each person amounted to nearly 6500 pounds, which was the highest quantity of money spent over the given period. Of this number, just under two thirds came from families with middle income. Meanwhile almost two-thirds of undergraduates had higher earnings in their families. By stark contrast, a tiny minority was estimated to have low economic background.
By 1997, university had a slight increase in number of students, while the government subsidies on each student declined dramatically to nearly 5,000 pounds. After this decrease, spending amounts leveled off and remained the same until 2001. On the contrary, the population of undergraduates increased extremely and reached almost 2.1 million in 1999. However, this number lowered a bit by 2001.
To sum up, the biggest part of students belonged to medium stratum in 1991. During the next 10 years, the total quantity of students rose generally, while government expenditures fell down, vice versa.
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and the comparisons whe 42
- The line chart shows average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in the US from 2000 to 2011 84
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjec 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... came from families with middle income. Meanwhile almost two-thirds of undergraduates had...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, third, while, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62311557789 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98148796291 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64824120603 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.8681001826 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327550387405 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099180151651 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938790753691 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194822132405 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914436422854 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.