The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012.
The chart represents about how three different types of crime changed in ten year period in Newport city centre. The data is calibrated in years from 2003 to 2012 and number of incidents in each year.
The major area of crime was burglary in 2003 which accounted for 3400 incidents followed by a boom of 400 more acts in next 1 year. Than it has shown a consistent decline for next 4 years and reached to about 1200 incidents in 2008. In 2009, burglary again reported to rise to upto 1400 cases whilst the same number of cases were reported in 4 successive years with slight fluctuations in between.
In 2003, the car theft happened for about 2800 times and the number of casea remained similar for 2 following years when a downfall to about 2000 car thefts were reported in 2006. The cases depicted a constant trend upto 2009 with a slight up and downs followed by a boom to 2600 cases in 2010 and about 2700 in 2012 except 2011 when it was declined a little. The incidents of robbery has shown a slight fluctuating trend throughout 10 years. Initially there were 600 cases followed by a small escalations in following 2 years and a consistent decline in next 4 years. The similar trend was continued upto year 2012 when the equal number of incidents were reported as in 2003.
To sum up, the most happening crime was burglary in first 4 years albeit it reduced to second lowest whereas car theft and robbery represented many fluctuations while didnot changed much in 2003 and 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | sophia_ever | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | sophia_ever | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-01 | harniitkaur | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | sandee | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012. 67
- The diagram below shows the working of a refrigerator 72
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the silk cloth. 78
- The bar chart below show the medical research funding on some diseases and deaths caused due to them in someland in1990 figs in millions 92
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd number of incidents in each year. The major area of crime was burglary in 200...
^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...a boom of 400 more acts in next 1 year. Than it has shown a consistent decline for n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'reported rising'.
Suggestion: reported rising
...idents in 2008. In 2009, burglary again reported to rise to upto 1400 cases whilst the same numb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ined a little. The incidents of robbery has shown a slight fluctuating trend throug...
^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'escalation'?
Suggestion: escalation
...here were 600 cases followed by a small escalations in following 2 years and a consistent d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59176029963 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44502460027 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5664521057 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.454545455 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145249870109 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678700559389 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849415204656 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12479190822 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103569168461 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.