The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City centre from 2003-2012.
The line graph illustrated the annual shift in the quantities of various types of incidents taken place in Newport City centre between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, the figures for robberies experienced continuous oscillations, whereas those of burglaries and car thieves witnessed a downward tendency, in which stealing car was the most common crime and robbery was the least in 2012.
In the first five years of the given period, number of burglary and car thief cases faced a decrease, that of robbery fluctuated. To be more specific, figures of burglaries plummeted by 1800 cases, peaking at 3700 in 2004 and ending at 1600 incidents in 2008. In contrast, number of stolen cars declined then slightly rose, overtaken that of break-in in the mid of 2006, finishing the sub period at 2100 cases. Interestingly, quantities of robberies always bottomed the chart, vacillating around 500 and 900 cases.
In the remaining period, cases of car theft, burglary and robbery all experienced an upward trend, reaching the figures of 2700, 1400 and 600 incidents in 2008 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | sophia_ever | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | sophia_ever | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-01 | harniitkaur | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | sandee | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City centre from 2003-2012. 78
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 68
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City centre from 2003-2012. 84
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000 78
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by 1800 cases, peaking at 3700 in 2004 and ending at 1600 incidents in 2008. In...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35057471264 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79717431925 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626436781609 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4105736445 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898133577484 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444449467034 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759325667268 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714229786189 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900172668193 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.