summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the reading part describes fossil structures that found in volcanic but s\he claims that these pieces of evidence aren't fossils, and the listening section cast doubt on information presented in the passage and argues that these pieces of evidence are absolutely dinosaurs fossils and she illustrates her documents.
First, the passage posits that these features aren't functioning structures of living dinosaurs because might be other structures. However, the lecture makes the point that these features are like to dinosaurs structures
Second, according to the text experts don't know what part of them have these structures, the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that feathers of them have this structures and other materials don't have these features.
Third, the article claims that feathers are backbone and tail of the animals so feathers are unuseful for them, on the contrary, the lecture points out that although fethers are in the backbone, they colors show that these feathers belong to dinosaurs. therefore she says that these structures belong to dinosaurs are an undeniable fact, because their colors are white and orange.
in conclusion, the talk bolsters, the mentioned pieces of information in the passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Manjushree | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | shahabaddin_solaimanian | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Qwe | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Qwe | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Qwe | 70 | view |
- Why go to university? 73
- some people to take a position in a company and work for the company. other people think it is better to go into business for themselves. which do you think is better? give reasons and examples to support your response. 68
- we need zoos. Do you agree or disagree. 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 68
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...he claims that these pieces of evidence arent fossils, and the listening section cast...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... the passage posits that these features arent functioning structures of living dinosa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... Second, according to the text experts dont know what part of them have these struc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ave this structures and other materials dont have these features. Third, the articl...
^^^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'color'
Suggestion: color
...hough fethers are in the backbone, they colors show that these feathers belong to dino...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...hat these feathers belong to dinosaurs. therefore she says that these structures belong t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...hat these feathers belong to dinosaurs. therefore she says that these structures belong t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...use their colors are white and orange. in conclusion, the talk bolsters, the ment...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43654822335 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60288809045 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.8589282716 49.2860985944 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.5 110.228320801 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8333333333 21.698381199 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06452816374 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094868434623 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440499905903 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230631728854 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517038408399 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00998819800264 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.3589403974 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.