People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?
Urban citizens nowadays have to confront many issues in their daily life. It is agreed that the governments should inspire their residents move to small areas. This essay will discuss, firstly the difficulties of living in cities and secondly, the cruciality of moving to smaller towns.
In my opinion, there are many problems that people have to tackle when they live in a big city. Firstly, metropolises always have a large amount of populations, so, they usually be polluted by several ways. For example, Ho Chi Minh city is a large city of Vietnam so a lot of people live there. However, individuals are not concerned about environment much. They often throw trash on the road or into the drain and this causes flood on rainy days. Moreover, vehicle’s smoke can be released often because of the heavy traffic densities. Secondly, with a great population, it will be hard to find a job due to a competition in job markets. Finally, almost prices of products in large cities are costly although the qualities of goods are the same with ones in small towns.
There are many reasons for the governments to support their residents to change to live in small areas. By the moving of people, towns can be developed not only in economic but also in individuals’ life. People who workless in metropolises can find a good job in other towns, then, companies in small cities can boost their potential which they cannot be if they live in large cities. So, governments can show their people the advanatages of living in small cities by propagandising the benefits of the moving, demonstrating the formidableness of big cities. The governments have a huge affect to the locals. If they can do the influential campaign, countries reduce a lot of problems.
In conclusion, although some cities have been overloaded for years, they can bring problems to residents and governments in the development of the countries. So, I once again agreed with the opinion that people should leave big cities and move to the smaller to develop every area in one country.
- Task 2: The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 11
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be usually
...a large amount of populations, so, they usually be polluted by several ways. For example, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...he qualities of goods are the same with ones in small towns. There are many reaso...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91690544413 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82523524174 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515759312321 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0074784254 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3157894737 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298173322964 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894690102674 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692853255171 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196016584716 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265951432911 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.