The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010
The given pie charts compare and contrast some stricking differences in the amount of students who spoke more than one language - English at one university in England in the year 2000 and 2010, measured in percentages.
In general, there were some huge changes after 10 years in almost of languages.
It can be seen that, raised from 30% to 35% after a decade, Spanish was a language which spoken most in this university. Followed by the vast amount of students who spoke only English as a main language, it was the second highest in 2000 (20%), however, in 2010, the proportion declined dramatically to 10%. The number of students who spoken German or two other languages were the same in 2000 (10%). After 10 years, students who spoke two other languages remained the same while German rose to 15%. Additionally, pupils spoke French or another language were 15% in 2000, then, the proportion of another language spoken was grew to 20%, whereas in contrast, French was fell to 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Age structure of country X in 3 years 1950 2000 2050 89
- Task 2: The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 11
- Task 2 The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...oportion of another language spoken was grew to 20%, whereas in contrast, French was...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8224852071 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53924899668 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573964497041 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8101709246 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32491338777 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153568244646 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105213729396 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204166012024 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127507075821 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.