Many experts want to ban media or to seize their sovereignty. Why? Explain reasons and solutions.
Most of the people has been under the pressure of media and have had a detrimental effect on to themselves and society. Owing to the fact that experts argued to prohibit such media or at least minimize the involvement in general. Although, media had a lot of advantage, some negative involvement in term of terrific, criminal, and false belief also emerged in peoples mind which is an ultimate reason for intelligence bureau reports. However, to tackle such negative trend by proper legislation, strict punishment and ensure awareness program.
Initially, media plays an important role in peoples behaviour and attitude. Extravagance of media makes criminality and misleading believes about caste and creeds, natural calamities and politics. Certain sites may spreads irrelevant news and makes peoples mind in wrong direction to become an extremist and which would lead to discrimination inside the society. Many social media sites often disperse unlikely, negative information regarding environmental changes like floods, earthquake and following action in tragic crime. For example, recently in Kerala some groups widely stretch out false threads about preventive measures about Idukki dam open process and which impact distract actual follow up of officials. Moreover, expanding mass media and social media makes down studies of students in all category to some extent.
However, to mitigate crucial impact of media by constitution regarding false news spreaders and strict sentence for culprits. Likewise, government allow the normative censor board to cut short violent and insolent news even politics, spiritual and psychologically harmful. Moreover, instruct everyone the detrimental effect on such attitudes during school age and make a proper knowledge about to choose good sites and web. Stringent legislative committee to watch and control establishment of wrong games or practice by information technology act and law. For instance, enforcement of norm for wide spread blue whale game to be in controlled in many countries.
To sum up, media has spectacular advances, nevertheless, over exposure in society would may produce adverse ascending on people mind. Thus, to inhibit such activity and awkwardness by rules and regulation irrespective of their gender, caste or finance.
- Some accept state of the art innovation creating holes in between rich and needy individuals while others oppose the idea differentiate the two approach and offer your input 84
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 56
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n general. Although, media had a lot of advantage, some negative involvement in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, at least, for example, for instance, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64450867052 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90322055058 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632947976879 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7101928752 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.882352941 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112837443518 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356097855884 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299419333067 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657936922427 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224472252257 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.