Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.
Since the dawn of humanity, people have been always in search of doing tasks that result in their promotion. In this regard, most people are inclined to choose only one task and try to do it again and again in order to master it. In contrast, very few people have a tendency of facing with diverse and challenging tasks without any fear. I, personally, subscribe to the latter ones due to the many beneficial lied behind this risks that are taken by dautless people. Learning new things, bringing up an adaptable brain prepared to act in any given situation, and involving in new groups are only some of the advantageous of this suggestion, which are precisely explained as follows.
Although the majority of people think that by carrying one thing out you can master it, they do not take the invaluable experiences and knowledge being camouflaged behind every special task into account. In fact, the more you try new tasks, the more you can learn from them. More importantly, by doing so, one can be profoundly decisive whenever they are obliged to take a rapid action/decision in a determinative situation that has the label of fatality or success.
In addition, it has been proven that the function of the brain is enhanced through doing new works. As far as the brain concerned, the more it is challenged in doing new tasks, the more it is developed. Consequently, we intensively exclude the progress of our brain by doing a highly repeatedly action. Having said this, the scientists urge us not only to avoid useless and repeated works but also suggest us to do the regular ones in an abnormal way to ensure/guarantee the improvement of the brain and our mentality toward success. For instance, if you are right-handed, for a while, make an attempt to write by your left hand to vast the function of your brain.
Last but not least, the people who change their jobs regularly are more likely to find their ideal job rather than the ones only limit their activities to a unique task. Additionally, they have more chance in getting familiar with new societies and in turn new ideas that can be in the direction of their success. As a matter of fact, there have been many people whose destiny have been totally changed through an acquaintance with someone who has changed their goals/directions. I, for one, has experienced this miracle by getting familiar with my mother role, Dr. Ehsani, who has altered my attitude towards the world completely and also tempt me to do a project that was "out of question". In this regard, by being forced to do this new task, an appropriate situation provided to me that vitally led to my high ambitious in addition to my success.
To sum up, considering all the above-mentioned opportunities in doing new things, one should not confine themself to only one thing while there are still many joyful things to be done. More significantly, in order for us to learn the real meaning of life, we had better to encounter with any possible things, as well as enjoying them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | thakannv | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | naziii | 86 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sarah halawani | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | nusybah | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.” 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People should get a secure job right away rather than wait for a satisfactory one. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... due to the many beneficial lied behind this risks that are taken by dautless people...
^^^^
Line 1, column 597, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n, and involving in new groups are only some of the advantageous of this suggestion, which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an abnormal way" with adverb for "abnormal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... also suggest us to do the regular ones in an abnormal way to ensure/guarantee the improvement of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd to vast the function of your brain. Last but not least, the people who chang...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in fact, as a matter of fact, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2506.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79158699809 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80131101917 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506692160612 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5186500239 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.3 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.15 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288675835859 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08671880849 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482719331832 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158696156975 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023369722885 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.