In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion?
Recent decades have observed noted technological advancements enabling humans to work, shop and communicate online without any face-to-face interaction. Although the pattern’s disadvantages could be pronounced, it is not without advantages.
On the one hand, there are many benefits when it comes to this trend. First, Online shopping and telecommuting could minimize automobile dependency, reducing demand for vehicles. This would significantly decrease the concentrations of exhausted fumes in the atmosphere, acting as a deterent for environmental deterioration. Second, due to the characteristic of far-distant connection, online communication is proved to cultivate the relationships’ stability among individuals. For instance, long-distance couples could ultilize social network platforms and applications for interaction and conversation purposes, which could feed into lower possibilities of splitting-up in the long-term.
On the other hand, this pattern could be fraught with pitfalls. First, if inividuals overuse social networks on the Intenet for online communication, online addictions could ensue. It is implied that the in-personal interaction with family members and the outside world be non-existent, deteriorating the family bonding and depriving invididuals of basic life skills. In addition, since users could easily deceived by false profile potrayals on online social networks, they could fall pray to evil practices from cyber-criminals. In fact, without any actual face-to-face communication, innocent users could easily be the victims of cyber-abuse, sexual and physical assault or even human trafficking.
In conclusion,i believe that these modern innovations practically has both advantages and disadvantages. But if people could make proper use, the problems arsing could all be addressed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-09 | goodtime | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | dangtrinhlt | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | Pham Van Nhan | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss and give opinion 81
- Teachers used to convey information, but now with wide resources of information, there is no role for teachers to play in modern education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 100
- Some people think that the age limit for driving should be increased to make driving safer do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'deceive'
Suggestion: deceive
.... In addition, since users could easily deceived by false profile potrayals on online so...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...l assault or even human trafficking. In conclusion,i believe that these modern ...
^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , i
...even human trafficking. In conclusion,i believe that these modern innovations p...
^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ven human trafficking. In conclusion,i believe that these modern innovations p...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.30158730159 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58499188181 2.80592935109 128% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68253968254 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9914184581 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14779298608 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491011150965 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648888321319 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984847728543 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720880345265 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.96 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.