The graph below shows average carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart gives information about how much carbon dioxide a person emitted in four different countries in the world from 1967 to 2007.
It is clear that the amount of CO2 in Italy and Portugal saw a moderate increase during 40 years, the opposite was true for the last 2 nations. It is also notable that the English emitted the most CO2 at the beginning of the period.
In 1967, under 2 metric tonnes of Co2 was discharged in Portugal compared to over 4 tonnes in Italy. From the year 1967 onwards, both 2 countries witnessed a gradual rise before standing at nearly 6 and 8 tonnes for Portugal and Italy respectively. During the next 10 years, the amount of carbon dioxide grew up slightly while that in Italy remained stable at about 7.9 tonnes in 2007.
Looking at the other countries, the British emitted the most deal of CO2, at more than 10 tonnes in comparison with only 9 tonnes in Sweden. During the next 30 years, the average number of CO2 emissions in UK saw a continuous decline by 1.5 tonnes. At the same time, the amount of CO2 reached the highest point at over 10 tonnes in 1977, flowed by a significant decrease till the end of the beginning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-28 | fadhiahelbas | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | LIMIAO | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Huy Hoang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | damladogan | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | SaeidAp | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tones from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 67
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment?Give reasons for your answer and incl 68
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade -labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Now many scientific institutes conduct research on live animals Some people regard it as cruel and unnecessary while other people believe it is justified in the interest of human welfare Discuss both views and give your reasons 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47887323944 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43674183525 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8987569409 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173074413242 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768183335819 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368005217091 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112604555948 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328056659573 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.