Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In this day and age, the usage of packaging of products is always a topic of interest. While it is argued that the main factor contributing to deplete the amount of packaging of commodities are manufacturers and supermarkets while others believe that customers are the only ones to be obliged for this issue. Although manufacturers and outlets are in charge of the process of devising packaged goods, I lean towards the latter.
On the one hand, manufacturers and markets are directly related to goods-packaging procedure. In fact, to guarantee the products’ quality and deter them from being exposed to detrimentally environmental factors such as moist or heat, companies tend to utilize plastic bags to package these goods, which can results in an abundant amount of plastic waste. Therefore, the burden of decreasing the great deal of packaging is recommended to put on their shoulders. For example, numerous food agencies have decided eradicate completely the packaging of goods or eschew plastics in favor of paper which are easier to be recycled in terms of products-packaging to minimize the adverse impact on the environment.
On the other hand, the obligation to plummet the quantity of packaged commodities is also said to belong to customers. That is because they have a preference of buying goods that are thoroughly packaged owing to their longer expiry date. As a result, they are likely to use them for a long time with the deteriorating quality. Moreover, customers also have a tendency of abusing to package things. Evidently, a large number of people use a massive capacity of plastic bags or other materials to package food, drink, leftover or wrap goods they purchase from supermarkets. The result of this is that the surroundings will be soon polluted with the non-biodegradable trash leading to an unhealthy life for individuals.
In conclusion, though manufacturers and supermarkets assume responsibility for packaging goods, purchasers are more under obligation to decline the amount of these products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | duykhanh3204 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 71 | view |
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make com 82
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos xan be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give you own opinion 73
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 67
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
... bags to package these goods, which can results in an abundant amount of plastic waste....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...f abusing to package things. Evidently, a large number of people use a massive capacity of plasti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19202657945 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552469135802 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4383577107 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313011940491 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110384378671 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600845762165 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189925296795 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305886345716 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.