the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (co2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. summaries the information by selecting and the reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the average carbon dioxide emission per person in four countries over 40 years from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, the CO2 emission by each person in United Kingdom was the highest over the four countries although the figure shows the declining over the period. Whereas, Portugal shows the lowest in the carbon dioxide emission per person, however it increased significantly from 1967 to 2007.
It can be seen from the line graph that the CO2 emission per person in UK was just below 11 tons in 1967, which was the highest in comparison with that of other countries. however, the figure shows the steady decline to about 8.5 tons in 2007. The Sweden shows the increase in the average carbon dioxide emission per person from about 8.5 tons in 1967 to hit the top just over 10 tons in 1977 before went down to about 5 tons at the end of the period.
By contrast, CO2 emitted by Portuguese was the lowest at only about 1 ton in 1967. however, it went up steady to about 5 tons, which was as much as that of Sweden in 2007. The figure for that of Italian also shows the remarkable increase from just over 4 tons in 1967 to just below 8 tons at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...omparison with that of other countries. however, the figure shows the steady decline to...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...the lowest at only about 1 ton in 1967. however, it went up steady to about 5 tons, whi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f Sweden in 2007. The figure for that of Italian also shows the remarkable increa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41095890411 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21944114043 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415525114155 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2610932182 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290518446701 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146325648893 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848234291456 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222624366 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759214229578 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.