The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table gives information about how many people, who visited British, used three main airports in the period from 1998 to 2003.

Overall, it is clear that there were significant upward trends in the number of visitors at three airports over a 5-year period. Another noticeable point is that Gatwick was the most popular airport over most years in question.

Looking at the details, regarding Gatwick and Stansted, the figure started at 36.5 million travelers and 17.3 million travelers in 1998, respectively. At this point, the figure in 2002 for both airports went up gradually, at 51.1 million for Gatwick, compared to 43.3 million for Stansted. Following this, there was a sharp increase in the figure for Gatwick, hitting a peak of 69.3 million in 2003. Meanwhile, the number of visitors in Stansted experienced a levelling off over the second half of the whole period.

In terms of Heathrow, despite growing considerably form 27.2 million in 1998 to 48.2 million in 2002, the number of visitors the fall quickly to 33.2 million in the next two years. However, it then recovered to 45.6 million in the final year.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-02 hxyav 84 view
Essays by user lkq121196 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...hitting a peak of 69.3 million in 2003. Meanwhile the number of visitors in Stansted expe...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, second, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01063829787 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52775449353 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6403399336 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142959429088 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654622456814 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799279507769 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112428039643 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978418928344 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.