Some people think that the government should ensure the healthy lifestyle of people, but others argue that it should be decided by individuals.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowdays, government throughout the world grappling with the problems like rising unemployment and growing threats of terrorism. Poverty is still a major issue in many countries like as; Asia, Africa and India. But, today the topic asserts that who is the more responsible for healthy lifestyle government or individuals? Now, I am going to examine some possible points with the following paragraph and shape up my opinion by the end.
Take one side argument, group of people believe that government is responsible for healthy lifestyle but how? There are number of answers related to this topic. First of all, in my country every facilities are available, but everything is very expensive. Every person cannot afford these expensive things easily. So that, government should provide free medical treatments for the public as well as need to open new health centre for the individuals, which is effective way to improve our healthy lifestyle. Take for instance, recent research suggests that in the Europe countries government provide all kind of facilities to the individuals at a cheapest price like as; gym, medical facilities and healthy food etc. So that, there the standard of living is very good.
On the other side, opponents of this argument numbers of people believe that individuals are responsible for healthy lifestyle. It is true, in this modernisation era every person have a hectic lifestyle. But, they have to need to do little exercise to stay our body fit and fine. Apart from that, in these days youngsters are preferred to the western culture, they like to eat adulteration food rather than the home made food like as; burger, pizza, so on. A one good illustration is organic farming is defined as farmers need to grow crops with the natural sediments, which give them higher profit as well as better results for our health. Furthermore, environment is polluted by the residents day by day, they are very careless. For example, mostly people using their personal vehicle for travelling. So that, pollution is rising continously and it create bad impacts on living organisms.
Tu sum up, after discuss both sides of views decide that both are responsible for protection of human health. However, they can improve it, if they co-operate with each other and solve this problem easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-10 | Prince gill | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-10 | Prince gill | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-10 | Prince gill | 84 | view |
| 2017-10-20 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 90 | view |
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business.what do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more peo 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 56
- Some people say part time jobs are useful for full time students because they have not only earn money but also gain career experience Do you agree or disagree 87
- Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be build in countryside 81
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ind of facilities to the individuals at a cheapest price like as; gym, medical fa...
^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...hermore, environment is polluted by the residents day by day, they are very careless. For...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 852, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
... pollution is rising continously and it create bad impacts on living organisms. Tu ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, apart from, for example, for instance, kind of, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11375661376 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70138984019 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1975758385 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0476190476 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148955507278 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383210877797 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488612112753 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930507795607 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303262877438 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.