Some people believe that reducing speed limits is the best option for road safety improvement. Do you think there are other measures that could put in place? What are advantages and disadvantages of this?
Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Safety first is safety always. It is extremely important factor to look after, while we are driving or doing something else. One of the most controversial issue today relates to that, reducing speed limits; is only a solution for road safety improvement or not? I completely disagree with the statement and given reasons for this, through some assertions and examples in the further piece of essay.
The first step to understand what other measures could be taken to improve road safety? Broadly speaking, most significant factor is taxation. Meanwhile, as we all know that paying tax is highly beneficial for citizens better lifestyle. Therefore, toll tax is the tax which is for better roads and safety of people. But, what will be demerits of not paying tax? It is well known that government needs money for improving many aspects and infrastructure of roads is one of them. However, if people will not pay their tax that will be an issue for both citizens and for government, while it will be burden on government to arrange money due to lack of tax there will be no improvement on the roads safety.
As reducing speed is not only major point for better road safety and there many other main aspects as well. The second prominent point is visual pollution. There are many highways or national highways there are number of advertisements and billboards of products which distract people from driving and due to that many accidents take place. What will be the positive impact of no visual pollution? There will be neither distraction nor any occurrence for accidents and people could drive with full concentration. For instance, recently in a report of United States it was seen that, visual pollution is the most common reason for accidents on roads in U.S.
Eventually, I take this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands and tend to believe that both government and individual should take initiative. Every individual should pay tax and government could make stringent laws for no billboards or advertisements on main roads for its safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-20 | Jagdeep kaur | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-19 | Jagdeep kaur | 22 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment books is waste of time. In their opinion, children should read only serious, educational books. Do you agree or disagree? Give reason for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience. 38
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in the three major cities.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Learning english at school is often seen as more important than leaning local languages. If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out. In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn english? Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 67
- The graph below shows how prices of “high-tech gadgets” changed over time in Some country.Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown.Write at least 150 words 67
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 36
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
Safety first is safety always. It is extremely important factor to lo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, while, broadly speaking, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9711815562 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70478559097 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507204610951 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5928488072 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222898170145 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742190791901 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522963659626 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140131573997 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052683630586 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.