Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
With the increase in pace of time, people are working hard to live a better lifestyle. One of the most controversial issue today relates to that, leaving rural areas and working or studying in cities is giving positive or negative impact on development? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic through some assertions and examples in the further piece of essay.
There are some people who believe that, working in cities can put pessimistic impact on development. Why do they think so? The prominent reason to understand this is underdevelopment of rural areas. If everyone from rural areas will go either for work or study in cities than there will be no advancement in the rural areas. Similarly, the education and facilities which are provided to children in rural areas will be wasted because the upcoming generation can get admired from the elders and also go for studies in cities. Moreover, People also mention that, the hard work which young people are putting in cities can be applied in rural areas for the development.
There are another group of people who argues that, working and studying in cities put optimistic impact on development. Why do they feel so? The foremost reason is no more unemployment. People often have this opinion because if there will be more people in cities who will adapt advanced education, as they can get perfect jobs according to there qualification which might not be possible in rural areas. In addition, If people will study in urban areas and become doctor or engineer can develope the rural areas as well. Then there will be more hospitals and more jobs for people in either urban or rural areas who are unemployed. Meanwhile, this will be highly beneficial for the economy as well. Although, there will be neither underdevelopment in rural areas nor in urban cities. For instance, in America, 80% people are migrating and working hard in cities for the development of the country.
In conclusion, as we all know that it absolutely depend on an individual that where he wants to study or work and if people will come cities and give there best than there will be advancement with majority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-29 | Rajan khehra | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | eyraen | 93 | view |
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison 68
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in the three major cities.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female Academic Staff members across the faculties of major University in 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, but make no effort to do so (reasons and solutions). 73
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
... the development. There are another group of people who argues that, working and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, while, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90489130435 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66849348043 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445652173913 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4846688415 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277301865326 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100692324365 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585618140329 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179664197362 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657197351741 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.