Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, students spend a lot of money and time for tertiary education. Since the parents persuade their children to continue the secondary education in science related subjects, majority of the students tend to follow subjects like engineering and medicine over the others. This is with the sole expectation of entering a career path with many remunerations. But, one cannot disregard the importance of arts subjects such as philosophy and history. Because, not everyone is expertise on the science related subjects involving complex calculations, theories etc.
Studying a subject like philosophy offers many benefits to students. These include improvement in logical thinking, arguing and debating. On the other hand, learning the local history and world history would make students more patriotic. Apart from that, it would convince the students on the strategies in the management of social and natural calamities. Moreover, there is a saying “history repeats”. So one can learn from the history about the good governance, international relationships, and political stability of the country accordingly.
However, people with innate talents in science and engineering should be given the opportunity to follow undergraduate courses as they desire and achieve their ultimate goals. Because, as a world, it is very important to carry out research projects and discover the hidden treasures in the fields like medicine to cure people with non-communicable diseases. Not only that, the engineers could help the world with new innovations and inventions to make the Earth, a pleasant place to thrive in for all the living beings.
To conclude, I totally disagree with the opinion which is put up so as not to teach arts subjects at universities. Furthermore, I would like to suggest that even a student follows a science or engineering course, it is better if he/she has a knowledge in arts subjects in order to improve their logical thinking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | vaishali saral | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world. What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l stability of the country accordingly. However, people with innate talents in s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'knowledge'.
Suggestion: knowledge
...ring course, it is better if he/she has a knowledge in arts subjects in order to improve th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, apart from, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44590163934 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06283914148 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603278688525 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5131560728 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109171043986 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346804957328 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335159193983 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634971603853 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142516071231 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.