Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that having friends either old or new can help us not only in our lives but also in our work. People usually find friends because of some reasons such as have a trip, or go to the party, or do a meeting and talk about the routine or non-routine tasks in their lives. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concerns, people differ greatly on their attitudes towards this question that “is it good to keep they old friend or make new friends?” A host of people from one camp are in the conviction that keeping old friends is better. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another camp embracing the view that being in a relationship with new friends is more effortlessness for them. Where I to choose between these options, I would take side with second cited alternative. I think this way because of two of the main reasons which will be discussed in the following essay. The first one is about losing our connection with our old friends, and the second one is about reducing our old friends’ attractiveness. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that, also, keeping old friends is a good choice. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.
First of all, I strongly believe that our connections with our aged friends, presently, may be lost. Nowadays, people’s lives may be adjusted in every day or week or so on. So, linking with others become harder. For example, Soheil is my high school’s friend which we had a close relationship and were the best friend of each other. He modified his settlement and apply for an American university for higher education. Since that time, our linkage becomes demolition. Therefore, become new friends can help us to call them easily.
Another reason which should not go unnoticed is contracting our old friends’ attraction. In our modern lives, all people have one main preoccupation which is own life. Today’s life becomes seriously harder and everybody only has time to occupy in his daily routine task and not much time for reviewing old memories and calling his friends. This category of people, their colleagues become their friend and not remained old friends.
In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. The first piece of evidence we need to state more is about memories of old friends. Regardless of the points outlined above, keeping old friends can influence our life. In this Modern lifestyle, when we are tired and our life is boring, talking or seeing old friends or reviewing past memories can have us to make a fresh start for the rest of our life. Therefore, this point should never be forgotten.
To put all into the nutshell, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to acquisition new friends. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since not only it’s easy to join up with new friends but also established friends attractiveness after sometimes are decreased. In the final analysis, the writer’s recommendation cannot be taken to be true because, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above, it depends on a number of conditions each of which should be satisfied. The recommendation can only be accepted if the mentioned statement already referred to are all implied appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | m_elec | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | JohnSmith96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Navis | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 66 | view |
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
...ys, people's lives may be adjusted in every day or week or so on. So, linking with othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 427, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'memories'.
Suggestion: memories
...king or seeing old friends or reviewing past memories can have us to make a fresh start for t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3152.0 1977.66487455 159% => OK
No of words: 632.0 407.700716846 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98734177215 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01394158123 4.48103885553 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87904254846 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 309.0 212.727598566 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488924050633 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 973.8 618.680645161 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4842029931 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321463747192 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953878609251 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130037637685 0.0737576698707 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261420751844 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.333405439013 0.0645574589148 516% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.