opinions about communal online encyclopedias
There are two opinions about communal online encyclopedias which represented in lecture and passage. Passage account for demerit of them by three reasons, on the other hand, lecture disagree with the passage and give three reasons. I try to elaborate debate in following paragraphs.
The first reason was mentioned by the narrator was about how error and faulty will be in communal online encyclopedias because most of their editor do not have academic credentials and make them untrustable. the professor did not concede that and explains that online encyclopedias are more trustable as they updated every moment and if there was any error it will be corrected easily, on the contrary in traditional ones, there will be some difficulties to correct the error and it may take a long time.
Also, the writer of passage believe that everyone can easily change the originals information and it gives bad guys opportunity to do everything they want but it should be noted that any changes in the traditional encyclopedia are impossible. Professor rejects his reason and stand out for her idea and amplify that it does not possible to anyone change context of online encyclopedia since the user can only see reading format of it and the exclusive user only were allowed to edit context.
To wrap it up, the writer explains about his last reason which is about how the owner of this online directory can decide to boast some topics intentionally and it had an impression on readers. on the other hand, audio thought that is one of the most advantageous of an online directory and it gives readers an opportunity to easily find important articles from a diversity of topics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-28 | cc919 | 93 | view |
| 2021-01-07 | Maedeee | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-11 | Joanne Chang | 76 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | Raed Mudawar | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | moath322 | 63 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Some say that people living in high-rise apartments are lonely and unhappy, while others say that it’s advantageous to stay in high-rise apartments 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1997 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The chats below show the number of Japanese tourist travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market. 73
- Some people think that all university student should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... credentials and make them untrustable. the professor did not concede that and expl...
^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'originals'' or 'original's'?
Suggestion: originals'; original's
...eve that everyone can easily change the originals information and it gives bad guys oppor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'changes'.
Suggestion: changes
...ify that it does not possible to anyone change context of online encyclopedia since th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ly and it had an impression on readers. on the other hand, audio thought that is o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9537366548 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75153183152 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555160142349 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.468058063 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.666666667 110.228320801 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2222222222 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313625739685 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135770627188 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171254063805 0.0662205650399 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170658469336 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643601254825 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 53.8541721854 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.