Government should spend money to encourage the development of sport and art for school students, rather than supporting professional sports and art performances for the general public.
Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.
Development of sport and art by government is a problem of controversy. people are split on this idea. Some of them acclaim that engaging school student to take part in sport and art classes rather than supporting professional sports and performances for the general public is better idea while other opposite that idea.
People who swear by encouraging student school reason that playing sport can help teenagers and kids be healthier. Also, it should be noted that art and sport both together would practically learn soft skills to pupils during acting or playing sport. The best example for this is team working and critical thinking which can burgeon highly. With that in mind, there is no wonder why individuals who experienced art or sport classes in schools can tackle with difficulties in every arena of life better in compare of others.
As stated by many researchers and practitioners, sport is a very strong mean for school students to get rid of their anger and stress by physical activities. Playing any kind of sports can allow them to gain access to new world where they can enjoy happiness and collaboration.
To wrap it up, despite the all possible advantages of development of sport and art in schools which were articulated, there are clearly various concerns connected with it. that is partly because of lack of laws or monitoring for quality of sport in schools but supporting professional sports and art performances for the general public is not good idea for using government budget and in my view point, government must develop and monitor art and sport in schools precisely to not causes physical problems or any kind of harms for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | yasamin27 | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | krishil_111 | 89 | view |
- Prevention is better than cure."Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment tospending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorernations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it theresponsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after theircitizens themselves? 73
- Some people think that all university student should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 73
- the chart below sows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 11
- The line graph outlines energy consumption in the USA from 1980 to the present day with further projections up until 2030 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...government is a problem of controversy. people are split on this idea. Some of them ac...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ssional sports and performances for the general public is better idea while other opposite tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nal sports and art performances for the general public is not good idea for using government b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98571428571 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71575148393 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567857142857 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.4773663919 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.909090909 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434039649863 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157839189622 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12877144125 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271492353387 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128216408874 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.