The lecturer disputes the accuracy of information about Peary's journey to the North Pole. He asserts that there is no conclusive evidence to support that Peary did reach the North Pole.
First, the lecturer argues that the decision declared by National Geographic investigation committee does not provide evidence that Peary did reach the North Pole. According to the lecturer the committee members who took the decision were close friends of Peary and some of them funded his trip to the North Pole. Therefore,it possible that the committee member were not telling the truth.
Second, the lecturer argues that the trip of Avery is different than Peary trip to support his arrival at the North pole in 37 days..He contends that Peary traveled in harsher whether conditions. Moreover, he carried more weight on the sled than Avery did. Therefore, it is possible that he was not able to reach that far in such short period of time.
Finally, the lecturer argues that Peary used a primitive camera with unclear pictures to support his presence at the North pole while taking them.. The author claims that the shadow and the sun position supports the argument that those pictures were taken at the North Pole. However, the lecturer contends, that the shadows in the photographs are not clear and accordingly the position of the sun is not accurate. Moreover, the pictures were very old. As a result, the pictures were fade and blurred. Thus they might have been taken somewhere else than the North Pole
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ed his trip to the North Pole. Therefore,it possible that the committee member were...
^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ues that the trip of Avery is different than Peary trip to support his arrival at th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...his arrival at the North pole in 37 days..He contends that Peary traveled in harsh...
^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...s arrival at the North pole in 37 days..He contends that Peary traveled in harsher...
^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ot able to reach that far in such short period of time. Finally, the lecturer argues that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me. Finally, the lecturer argues that Peary used a primitive camera with uncle...
^^
Line 6, column 147, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ence at the North pole while taking them.. The author claims that the shadow and t...
^^
Line 6, column 485, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'faded'.
Suggestion: faded
...ery old. As a result, the pictures were fade and blurred. Thus they might have been ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 503, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...lt, the pictures were fade and blurred. Thus they might have been taken somewhere el...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98412698413 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40121011736 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503968253968 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9525598319 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7142857143 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315244165911 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111146419785 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105248094425 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221146838394 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081140157321 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.