The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The graph provided represents the transportation of amount of goods in the UK through four various types of transport between 1974 and 2002.
Overall, it was observed that there were many fluctuations in the trajectory for all the modes of transport but only a slight increase was seen, while few are at a constant place.
From the general perspective, the transportation of goods through roads raised from 70 million tonnes in 1974 to nearly 100 million tonnes where a sudden elevation was observed in 1994. Comparing water and rail transport as both of them started at approximately 40 million tonnes, the former was found to be raised by about 20 million tonnes and later as at a plateau stage after facing many fluctuations. Finally, the pipeline transport was found to be the least of all modes of transport from 1974 and continued to be the lowest up to 2002. Though it was the minor mode of transport, the path of the graph increased gradually to nearly 10 times, from 2 million tonnes to 20 million tonnes.
In conclusion, all the modes of transport were improved progressively with minor elevations at each stage but, railway transportation remained at the same position from 1974 to 2002 with minute deviations in 1985 and 1995.
- The first bar chart descibes the important reasons for study among students of different age while the second chart illustrates the amount of money they were supported by employers. 73
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown museum during the year befkre and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the resukt of surveys askong visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ed by about 20 million tonnes and later as at a plateau stage after facing many fl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92417061611 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83824139293 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54028436019 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.2387774524 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.428571429 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323059541841 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185170175302 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142358240506 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240707118534 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156967367637 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.