The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph compare four modes of transport in terms of the amounts of goods they conveyed in the UK from 1974 to 2002
At first glance, it is noticeable that the quantities of goods transported by nearly all means of transport witnessed an increase over the time frame with the exception of rail. Also, road registered the highest amount of goods/ was responsible for the transportation of most goods throughout the period
In 1974, about 70 million tonnes of goods were transported by road, compared to 39 million tonnes carried via waterways. While the trend for road was upward with some fluctuations and a mild growth to a peak of 95% in 2002, the good transport by water was consistently below 60 million tonnes until 1998, before rising to around 65 million tonnes in the final year.
In the meantime, the initial quantity of goods conveyed through pipeline were 5 million tonnes. Over the following 8 years, there was an upsurge in its figure to 25%, followed a period of stability and then a downfall when it falling back to 20 million tonnes. By contrast, the good conveyance via railways proved quite erratic, with its figure varying between 30 and 40 million tonnes over the timescale.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 89
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 60
- The pie charts compares three different groups in terms of the the number of artciles from academic journals read weekly at a university in Australia It is evident that the number of journal articles varies widely in different groups The vast majority of
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...tnessed an increase over the time frame with the exception of rail. Also, road registered the highest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62342415823 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6038647343 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.6581390275 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.666666667 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309882012725 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144320514057 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133478896739 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217421886922 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13174013252 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.