Some people give that competitive sports are good for bringing together different people and cultures. Others argue that these sports can cause problems and can increase conflicts between the nations. Discuss both point of view and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there has been a positive trend that sports has gained popularity in society. One of the most controversial issue today relates to that, competitive sports; either bring people together or increase conflict between nations? In this essay, I am going to explore all the dimensions of the given topic through assertions and examples and shape up my opinion by the end.
First step to understand that, why some people think that competitive sports is increasing conflict among nations? The prominent reason is fights between players or supporters. It has been seen that in sports players fight and argue on the field in aggression for winning. Similarly, it has been also seen that people who are supporting there favorite players often fight or argue with each other. Sometimes, these fights end with disappointment among players and can also become the reason for division of people. For instance, in a report of sports tournament it is shown that players often fight on the field and this can be the reason for the aggression they show on ground for each other.
However, there are some people who believe that, sports competition bring people together from different cultures and nations; why do they think so? The first and foremost reason is tourism. There are plethora of people who travel distinct places to watch different sports events such as, cricket, football, hockey or Olympic games. Moreover, these events give a chance to different people from several countries to know about each others language, nature and many other habits. In the meantime while people are watching match they can also interact with each other and can share different ideas. Likewise, these types of events also make strong communication among the people of various places. Further more, it has been seen in between many players who build strong relationships with there opponents.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that, competitive sports events are significant because these are the main platforms which give chance to people for interacting with different age groups and traveling to distinct places which can build strong communication throughout countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-04 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | mostafa jahangiri | 56 | view |
- Some believe that they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some business observe that new employees who just graduated from a college or university seem to like interpersonal skills needed for communication with their colleagues What could be reason for this What solution can help address this problem 54
- Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages or environmental problems associated with this? 67
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Other think it's a disadvantage for them. Discuss both point of views and give your opinion. 67
- In some countries, it is illegal for an employer to reject job applications on the basis of age criteria. Is it a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... It has been seen that in sports players fight and argue on the field in aggressi...
^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...om several countries to know about each others language, nature and many other habits....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24495677233 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59329808555 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495677233429 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3776739697 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.058823529 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38054346683 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117118320156 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752124021334 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223039036081 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511163230589 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.