Sometimes we have to present a lecture, speech or teaching a courses in high school, classroom, meeting, conference room or etc. If we want to have a good presentation about specific subject, we will need to have high self-confidence because it is a very stressful for all of us. Therefore, we could have made mistake during speech. This is very common between the speakers. I believe, we should have interrupt the speech and correct the mistake right away. I explicit my opinion in the next paragraph
First of all, if we do not correct the mistake right away, the speakers will not have informative presentation. The mistakes is important reason but we can discuss and find the best answer because sometimes this mistake could have new information in world. I would like share my own experience. For first one when I had a conference on world piece in the University of SFU is a Big Nine Conference member, I was anxiety, nervous and hasty. That had bad condition. I remember professor Jims discussing with me about my only mistake. He said me and encourage me because this mistake exactly was widespread between scientists and students because they did not known what this problem has been just discovered. Therefore, I and the audience detected the flaws in my reasoning. It was informative discussion.
Furthermore, times have changed, in the past, the speakers, tethers and somebody else made mistake during lecture you could not interrupt and correct the mistake right away. But in the modern society, you can discuss and speak about mistakes. All of us know what the mistakes happen frequently everywhere so it’s very important reason for detecting science. In an interactive atmosphere, reflections, self-contemplation, thinking and etc. have been changed. This phenomena help people for understanding together without any judgment.
To end up, although in some cultures claim for respecting to the speakers you should not interrupt and correct right away, efficiency and effectiveness seminars make to discuss and the mistakes are very common for all of us and interrupting is definitely logical and normal problem.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: books are not needed any more because people can read information on computers. 86
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Sometimes we have to present a lecture, ...
^^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a course' or simply 'courses'?
Suggestion: a course; courses
...o present a lecture, speech or teaching a courses in high school, classroom, meeting, con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'interrupted'.
Suggestion: interrupted
...the speakers. I believe, we should have interrupt the speech and correct the mistake righ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
... informative presentation. The mistakes is important reason but we can discuss and...
^^
Line 4, column 536, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...ssing with me about my only mistake. He said me and encourage me because this mistak...
^^^^
Line 6, column 436, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...flections, self-contemplation, thinking and etc. have been changed. This phenomena help ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17867435159 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99177644128 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544668587896 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.2907229089 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5714285714 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5238095238 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14331688972 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041466788682 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608192916019 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994380937798 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206488227039 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.