International tourism has become a huge industry in the world. Are the problems that international travelers cause greater than the advantages they bring?
The past few decades have seen a phenomenal upsurge of cross- border travel. While some are concerned that international visitors may cause problems to the countries they visit, I strongly believe that the advantages international travelers bring outweigh the negatives
Initially, all countries have within them people who exhibit undesirable behaviors. International tourists who are not aware of the influence of their actions to the environment throw trash directly onto the water, the road, which can create pollution and wastes. Besides, the rise in tourism is associated with conflict at times between people from different cultures when differing beliefs collide. Foreigners may find it hard to accept others’ tradition and show scare respect for local customs and religious beliefs, which can make them be subjected to custodial sentences. Nevertheless, the far greater impression international travelers leave is a good one. First, it is undoubted that tourism boost the economy and increase foreign currency by means of travel-related services. Tourism attracts the investment from government and international entrepreneurs, which can generate employment opportunities due to demands of goods and services. As a result, individuals’ living standard will be improved. Second, they can also bridge a close bond between different parts of the world. These travelers are like the ambassadors for their countries who help the local people gain international cultural exposures and can cause others to want to visit their countries. Both tourists’ and locals’ perspectives of cultural distinctiveness from all over the world can be significantly broadened. It is fair to say that the development can open up more opportunities for people from all over the world to establish relationships with local inhabitants.
To sum up, I whole-heartedly believe that transnational tourism should be seen as a drive for mutual understanding rather than the cause of tension.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-23 | Dilmurod Abdullaev | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | Hassan Riaz | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | trinhthanh | 11 | view |
| 2018-10-17 | trang2112 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, e-mails or telephone callsUse specific reasons and details to support your answer 61
- Some people think that art is an important subject for students at high schools. Others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- There is a fact that a number of parents now increasingly desire to send their children to study overseas What are the reasons for this trend 83
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe that it is the only way to save these traditions.Discuss both these view and give your opinion. 61
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both sides and give your opinions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The past few decades have seen a phenome...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, while, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72053872054 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32701506419 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5153507683 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257293543237 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802942058815 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072866047737 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187128891964 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910201648503 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.