Undoubtedly, tourism has gained immense fame around the globe lately. Although international tourists cause few disturbances, they also bring certain benefits to the visiting countries. I believe the pros of these visits are more than cons. The advantages being the improved economy and the drawback can be threat to the cultural identity.
On the one hand, travellers round the globe bring with them the currency used in their particular places, and get them exchanged for the money of the visiting country. As there would be more tourists, there would be increased variety of currencies. Consequently, the economy of the country would flourish as more and more foreign wealth would be brought. A report told that countries like Maldives having a surge of visitors each year owing to its breathtaking views have improved their financial status alot, and this was possible only due to high number of travellers there.
On the other hand, tourists along them bring their own culture. Since in many countries there is liberty to wear attire of one's own choice, there is high chance of young ones and adults being impressed by their culture and forget their own. Hence, following their customs due to the attraction which they find in them. This would put in danger the cultural variation which is the beauty of this world. Therefore, it would indirectly affect the tourism as well. Because one visit different countries owing to their unique traditions, way of living and food habits, when such things would extinct, it would have negative impact on tourism industry.
To conclude, even though tourists make better the financial status of the visiting places, they can negatively affect the cultural diversity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17985611511 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53947663233 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589928057554 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0535231127 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119767961651 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430170649612 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04743373888 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784641044211 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638150133382 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.