The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of Australian male and female in five levels of post-school qualifications in 1999.
It is obvious from the data that the majority of gender in post-school levels was male.
More than half of qualifications, in fact 3 out of 5, had the percentage of men higher than women, namely Skilled Vocational Diploma, Postgraduate Diploma and Master Degree. The proportion of male in Skilled Vocational Diploma, at 90%, was 8 times more than that of female while the men per cent of the other qualification was more than women percentage by 40% or less. The men who obtained Postgraduate Diploma was 10% higher than that of Master Degree whereas there was the opposite pattern in women at the same rate.
The rest of post-school qualifications including Undergraduate Diploma and Bachelor's Degree had female percentage better than the proportion of male. Undergraduate Diploma had half as many men as women whilst there was only 5% difference in Bachelor's Degree.
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing a 36
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 67
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students Or it can redesign spaces where students 75
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 71
- The gap between rich and poor is growing What problems does this create What can be done to tackle them 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e pattern in women at the same rate. The rest of post-school qualifications incl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16564417178 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10315457138 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503067484663 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4940101278 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17454298073 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105096543647 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596553683616 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139510308295 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611765064246 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.