TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task
The article discusses that the cause of the underwater sounds in Russian submarines and provides three theories to explain. However, the professor cast doubt on all the explanation made in the article.
First, the article states that the strange noises were actually the calls of male and female orca whales during a courtship ritual. The professor refutes this point by saying that orca whales are live near the surface, but submarines typically remain deep in the ocean and should not have been able to hear the whale sound from near the surface.
Second, the reading material avers that the sounds were caused by giant squid. The professor, conversely, disagrees with this explanation by stating that the squid have always lived in the ocean, but Russian submarine first detected quackers sound in the 1960s and disappeared two decades later in 1980s.
Third, the reading claims that the Russian submarines were picking up stray sounds from some military technology of another country's submarines that were secretly patrolling the area. The professor contends this point by saying that the submarine can not move or change the direction that quickly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | forperfect | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | forperfect | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Shayooooon | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | pritam89 | 71 | view |
| 2018-12-23 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...1960s and disappeared two decades later in 1980s. Third, the reading claims that the Ru...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 186.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2311827957 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41902626204 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9083423507 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454751208073 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191252335147 0.0996497079465 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108780497421 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2702203928 0.162205337803 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688343724731 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.