The professor in the lecture disagrees with the author of the passage that that the bizarre frog-like sound 'quackers' which occured in 1960s through 1980s and moved fast but not detected by the sonar (a method of detecting objects underwater) can be a sound of Orca whales, or a squid, or a foreign submarine.
First, the professor argues that Orca whale cannot be a answer for quuackers. To be more specific, the author suggests that the strange sound is a sound of the Orca whales when they are attracting males. However, the professor states that the whales lived near the surface and the submarine moved deep underwater which is difficult for people to detect the sound in the submarine. Moreover, if it was whale, they had to be detected by the sonar but they were not. Therefore, the professor clearly refutes the author's first point.
Second, the professor insists that qiant squid cannot be the suspect of quackers. In depth, the author claims that since their complex brain structure shows that they are intelligent which proves that they are able to make such sound. Moreover, they were able to be undetected because they have soft bodies with skeletons. On the other hand, the professor contends that there is no supporting reason for why the sound stopped although the squids still inhabit there. Thus, the author's third point is evidently rebutted.
Third, the professor maintains that foreign submarine cannot be the one which made the sound. In details, the author asserts that the unusual sounds from military technology collected by the Russian submarines were like the sound of the patrolling submarines of other countries and were not spotted by sonar because they were specially designed to avoid being noticed. Conversely, the professor declares that there is no technology to make the submarine move as quickly as the quackers. Furthermore, since the engine sound was not heard, it validates the professors calim because there was no technology to build the engine to make quiet engine sound. Hence, the professor undoubtedly repudiates the author's third point.
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...isagrees with the author of the passage that that the bizarre frog-like sound quackers wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
... frog-like sound quackers which occured in 1960s through 1980s and moved fast but not de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...fessor argues that Orca whale cannot be a answer for quuackers. To be more specif...
^
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'whaled'.
Suggestion: whaled
...d in the submarine. Moreover, if it was whale, they had to be detected by the sonar b...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hors third point is evidently rebutted. Third, the professor maintains that fore...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51458359741 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0174934435 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44373734955 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150151515635 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113159790094 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287816395962 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522352874099 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.