The table gives information about how many cars was produced in Agentina, Australia and Thai Land between 2003 and 2009.
As can be seen from the chart, despite of an insignificant in last two years, the majority of car manufacture in Thai Land comparison in two others that Argentina and Australia made fewer cars.
It is clear that in 2003, the car production in Thailand was highest at 700,000 cars while 400,000 of cars were made in Argentina, doubling the figure of Australia. In the next two years, the number of cars were increased and peaked at 1,119,000 cars and those of it in Australia rose significantly by 200,000 cars; however the production of cars declined to 200,000 cars.
In the year 2009, car manufacture in Thailand was a rapid decrease at 999,000 cars. This trend was true in Argentina that continued to show a fall of 161,000 cars. Nevertheless, the opposite trend was true in Australia, the quantity of car production went up to 600,000 cars.
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 56
- Finland telephone calls report. -Syerapke- (rewrite)Prompt :The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995-2004. 73
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior 78
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82035928144 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73517046006 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8232289216 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143777279471 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792502765258 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042475815087 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999254964854 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393986972796 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.