Both the author and the lecturor put doubt on one of Rembrand painting .
First of all, the author says that the painting not belong to rembrand because it not respect his style and methods working, neither the color nor the panel materiel are the kind that Rembramd known use.in other hand the lecturer argue that this panel is the original but modified.
Secondly, the author gives a few proves that this panel is not Rebrand painting sush as the way that the lady wearing and the reflexion of the light on her, and how this facts prove his idea.
In contrast, yhe lecturer says that the spesialits found that the original panel respect Rembrand's way of working.
In conclusion, the reading argue that the panel with the lady in fur dont belong to Rebrand, in other hand the lecturer try to confict that this panel belong ro him but modified and hide some important signs.
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
- some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- A friend who lives in another country has invited you to come and stay with him/her on your next holiday. You are too busy to accept the invitation. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: Thank him/her for the invitation. Explain why you cannot co 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...or put doubt on one of Rembrand painting . First of all, the author says that the...
^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'respects'?
Suggestion: respects
...g not belong to rembrand because it not respect his style and methods working, neither ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgue that this panel is the original but modified. Secondly, the author gives a ...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... reflexion of the light on her, and how this facts prove his idea. In contrast, yhe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...gue that the panel with the lady in fur dont belong to Rebrand, in other hand the le...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 1373.03311258 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 155.0 270.72406181 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66451612903 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15715367228 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 145.348785872 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 419.366225166 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6358608288 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.6 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.6 7.06452816374 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162978376166 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093785909146 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481605337464 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093785909146 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481605337464 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 63.6247240618 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.