You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for? Use reasons and examples to support your position.

Throughout history, leadership and choosing the best person as leader has played a prominent role in all societies, Due to its paramount importance effect on a society destination. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is which character can manage better as a leader for a group or society. Some people may hold the view that honesty is the most important property of a leader. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that some other things -such as emotion control, crisis management ability and etc.- are more important. In my perspective, there is some ability and property that is more important than honesty. I firmly believe that honesty is not the most important thing to consider for choosing a leader. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the properties which a leader should have, are very various. If we assume and compare a club or organization with an honest leader but not smart with a club that has a smart leader, I personally think the second one will be better in long time. For example, I know a sport club that had a manager, who was really honest but not enough smart and then, in crisis situations that usually happens for every sport clubs, he couldn't decide well lonely and finally, he decided to resign himself.

Another reason which deserves some words here is that the honesty is not a property that we can measure. Thus, the problem with this property is how we can find that a person is honest or not. I believe that the honesty is essential for a leader but we cannot measure it.

On the other hand, when a person has been chosen as a leader for a group, it is possible that his or her character to be changed over time. For example, I can remember when one of my friends had chosen as head of a team for doing a project in high school, his character changed from a nice person to a serious one. Thus, it is possible that if a person is honest before leadership, would have been dishonest after that.

In conclusion I think that there is some important and necessary property that a leader should have and honesty is one of them, but this is my deep belief that honesty is not the most important of them. Consequently, I highly suggest that in voting to a person for leadership of a group such as student club, we should have more concern in management ability than honesty.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 548, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...tion control, crisis management ability and etc.- are more important. In my perspective,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ually happens for every sport clubs, he couldnt decide well lonely and finally, he deci...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, really, regarding, second, so, then, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63844393593 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57034518727 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462242562929 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1939241086 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.611111111 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2777777778 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256569982918 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875366174714 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656798771021 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144304954036 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299272951873 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.