The pie charts illustrate e-commerce sales in electronics and Appliance, Food & beverage, home furnishing and video games, in Canada over 5 years (2005 - 2010).
Overall, it is clear that vast majority of online sales, Canadians, made for entertainment. While food and beverage experienced increase in sales, in contrast, Canadian bought on-line significantly less furniture.
Canadian spent the most money online purchasing electronic and appliances and video games. Although, proportion in sales reverse by 5% in both categories (18% to 23% and 35% to 30% respectively), total proportion remained same (53 per cent).
As for home furnishing and video games, similar reverse trend is seen, however, more significant. In 2005, people spent one quarter in on-line shopping buying furniture, while 5 years later, only 15% purchases of furniture have been made. In terms of food & beverage, 10 per cent increase in 5 years is seen (22% to 32%).
- Newspapers and books are outdated Why do some people believe this What is your opinion 47
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books boughtover the internet.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think secondary school students should study international news as one of their subjects. Other people say this is a waste of valuable school time. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- What are the causes of water scarcity? What are your solutions? 89
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39455782313 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9693920066 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700680272109 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.883406804 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184366813449 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700335666681 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078715527585 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112411231075 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856663463459 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.