The table below describes the number of people (in million) who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the comparison of the number of international tourists who went for travel over a 15-year period, between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, it is apparent that the number of international travelers increased for the all regions over the period given.
In 1990, 280.2 million of Europeans went to travel in different countries, higher than the other four given areas. The number Increased gradually and in 2005, it remained the highest at 400.2 million. A similar trend also observed for the people of Asia and the pacific. The number of tourists went up from 60.2 in 1990 to 135.8 in 2005, which was the second highest. However, in America, the number fluctuated, it stood at 80.5 million in 1990, rose over the next ten years, and after that, it slightly declined to 113.2 million in 2005.
With regards to Africa and the Middle East, the number of people also inclined over the next 15 years. In Africa, the number was 18.2 million in 1990, almost double than then number of the Middle East, rising steadily and reached 28.7 million in 2005. In the Middle East, the tourists number was lower than the other given regions, at the beginning and the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-17 | ziahasan | 80 | view |
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 61
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands, but nowadays an increasing number of them are done by using machines. Discuss the advantages or disadvantages of this development. 61
- The graph gives information about the technology that households in one us city used for watching television between 2004 and 2014 83
- The graph below shows the sales of children s books adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country 81
- the chart below show the percentage of male and female students getting top grades in 1960 and 2000. Summarise and information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80487804878 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35279777006 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50243902439 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0475472286 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28463051119 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125544479677 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754304700641 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200911464734 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832475823532 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.