The graphs below show where people first got their news, both about the world and about local news, between 1987 and 1997.
The graphs reveal the percentage about where people got their world and local news from 1987 to 1997. There are three different medias compare in the graph: television, newspaper and radio.
Generally, people got the information about world news was from television through the years. On the other hand, people used newspaper to access local news in the period of 1987 to 1997.
The using of television, newspaper and radio to access world news remained stable in the range of 65-67 percent, 20-25 percent, 9-11 percent respectively through the years. However, in the terms of getting local news, the pattern of newspaper figure was fluctuative, television used rose gradually from 19% in 1987 to 37% in 1997, radio remained stable in the range of 11-12%.
Interestingly, the figure of newspaper and television used in local news access showed a small gap which was only 3% in 1997, television was 37% and newspaper was 40% in detail.
To sum up, there was no significant change in the terms of how people use some medias to access local and global news.
- Some people argue that companies and private individuals, not governments, should pay the bill of pollution clean-up. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 65
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what men and women say makes them most happy 64
- The graphs below show where people first got their news both about the world and about local news between 1987 and 1997 65
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The bar chart show the information on road transport in European countries and time consumption in travelling per day by person. 53
flaws:
What does it mean for this sentence?
Interestingly, the figure of newspaper and television used in local news access showed a small gap which was only 3% in 1997, television was 37% and newspaper was 40% in detail.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 179 200
No. of Characters: 844 1000
No. of Different Words: 82 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.658 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.715 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.468 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.516 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.515 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.807 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.137 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4