What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?
Plant more trees and build parks
Stores stop providing plastic bags
Increase access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road
As the whole world is threatened by deteriorating environmental issue, some measures are carried out to curb further pollution, including planting more trees in parks, offering no plastic bags in stores, and making public transportation more easily available so as to control the number of cars in the street. Personally, I reckon that the last approach can solve the problem to the greatest extent.
To improve the public transportation system can serve as the most effective way to keep the air pollution at bay. The government is attempting to offer more means of communting, completing the public transportation system. In this case, taking taxi or a private car will not be the only choice for those who can find no bus stop in their neighborhood. Therefore, citizens are encouraged to pick public transportation nearby without hesitation, which will lead to less running cars on the road. As a result, the exhaust and the emission of carbon dioxide will be lower than before. In Beijing, the business and cultural center of China, where hazy days have haunted people’s life for months, the vehicle restriction rule has witness its effect on controlling air quality. Even though people may find it inconvenient in one or two days of a whole week, more routes for bus or subway can be a perfect substitute to reduce people’s complaint. In this way, a win-win situation can be totally achieved.
With respect to the approach of planting more trees and building more parks, despite the fact that it seems a way to remove the problem from root, the benefits gained can only be sensed in a long term. Trees cannot grow up in one day. In addition, catering them and even creating more parks consume more other resources without guarantee of a positive result, because the trees are easily ruined and extra care requires more human resources, which is not a worthy investment in regards of protecting local environment.
Besides, asking stores to stop providing plastic bags also plays a limited role. As is known to all, plastic stuff pollutes the soil because of the toxic elements produced after it is degraded, which does not directly harm the world where we are living. What’s more, the negative influence can be averted through some feasible measures. For example, starch can be added to the process of making plastic bags to facilitate the degradation, or we can produce more biodegradable plastic bags instead. Forbidding customers to use it cannot directly contribute to a clear environment.
To sum up, compared to eliminating plastic products and planting more trees, making public transportation a more-chosen way by perfecting it can more obviously reduce air pollution, since it benefits both people and the environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-07 | KshitijSingh | 90 | view |
2019-05-04 | zheng__zy | 90 | view |
2019-02-25 | Wang Xinyue | 78 | view |
2018-12-26 | zheng__zy | 90 | view |
2018-12-26 | zheng__zy | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Competition between friends usually has negative impacts on friendship. 91
- Ambitious dreams or realistic dreams 73
- People nowadays are busier than ever in work and school They want to spend more time to learn new things Which one will you choose to learn A Learn a new sport that you have never played before B Learn to cook food different from what you have learned bef 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement:It it better to spend money on travelling and vacation than save money for the future. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people who have different interests and personalities cannot be friends 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ic transportation more easily available so as to control the number of cars in the stree...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 476, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...urces, which is not a worthy investment in regards of protecting local environment. B...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctly contribute to a clear environment. To sum up, compared to eliminating plast...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, as to, for example, i reckon, in addition, as a result, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15521064302 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90072176436 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558758314856 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3393810987 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.368421053 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7368421053 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269338278326 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075615281912 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588744317606 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154007856753 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293924476772 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.