Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are always a very important occupation in the world. However, some people think the value of the teacher is declining in recent years. Indeed, I have the same feeling about the attitude, which people how to treat their teachers nowadays, and I believe teachers are more appreciated and valued by society in the past than nowadays. I will explore the reasons in the following essay.
First of all, in the past, especially several hundred years ago, teachers were considered one of the sacred jobs because knowledge has extreme value in that time. Most people who had knowledge usually would not share with others. Therefore, when someone had enough knowledge and willingness to teach others, he would be respected extremely. What's more, it was not to say if there was a teacher, every people could take the lesson only he or she got enough tuition. Teachers would pick the students in ancient society, which meant if the teacher thought you were not having the quality to be taught, you would not have the opportunity to learn with the teacher no matter how much money you had.
In contrast, nowadays' people are pretty easy to have a teacher, and most people have not only one. Besides, although knowledge is not worthless, it is not as rare as the ancient society anymore. For example, the rudimentary, junior, and senior schools are ubiquitous in modern society. In every stage when students in the school, they will have different teachers to teach them the basic knowledge which they need to know. Nevertheless, in the past, universal education is never appearing in any place of the world.
Moreover, today's world is changing faster than we thought. In the past 5 years, many youth people could even learn anything without going to schools. The internet gives the young students have the chance to choose to no enter the school. And if they have good arrangements, they may have the probability to learn better than go to schools. In this aspect of changes, teachers seem not essential anymore.
In summary, teachers still have their values in the society, but this job is really not as crucial as the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | naziii | 73 | view |
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 79
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic an 80
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole. 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...thers, he would be respected extremely. Whats more, it was not to say if there was a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...eless, in the past, universal education is never appearing in any place of the world. Moreover,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, for example, in contrast, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89226519337 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47006589843 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549723756906 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7004194611 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.55 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226089228153 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641278463484 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584793793032 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132895351791 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676657404281 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.