Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of civilization, teachers have been having a high and respectful position among the people. Due to the important role in training the people, they are always placed at the center of heed. Although some debate that teachers were more respectful in the past and people more appreciated them in comparison to nowadays, the vast majority of people deny it and believe they have the same social place as before. From my perspective, I firmly believe that their role in society gets less and less every day and they are appreciated less. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my ideas cogently.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that compared to the past, our society is formed from more educated people. In other words, by increasing the considerable rate of educated people in recent decades, individuals are more aware and knowledgable, hence they feel less the value of the teacher. It is like the land that suffers from lacking water and people more pun value on the water but when they have plenty of water they don't pay attention to it.
Another noteworthy point in corroborating this issue is the development of technology has influenced all aspects of humans life especially learning. In contrast, there were only a few teachers to teach people and there were not any other sources for learning except some few books that all people did not access to it. Today, not only the government provides many libraries for studying but also the internet help people to gain the specific materials that they want. Its advantages are it provides sources in the spur of the moment and accurately, therefore it prevents wasting time and also, sharing materials. Besides, it provides circumstances for discussing and transferring experience. I strongly believe if the internet was not, the student would have encountered many questions that were unanswering.
In brief, enhancing the number of educated people and also the number of teachers are part of this less appreciating. More importantly, it is axiomatic that the internet can answer all our questions freely and quickly and it has been involved ab enormous data that a person never can learn individually. Consequently, all these factors help teachers less be valued.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | naziii | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- stone balls 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- stone balls 71
- TPO 24 integrated writing 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...but when they have plenty of water they dont pay attention to it. Another notewor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, in brief, in contrast, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0563002681 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78333509759 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538873994638 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0894581974 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.941176471 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183207273672 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521853073899 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441921255814 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107638973274 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482140511529 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.