Many people believe that inherent talent is more important than practice in many fields like sport or music. According to them great musicians and sportsmen are born and can’t be created. However, others claim that talent has little to do with success and any child can be taught to become a great sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Innate gifts and hard work are two sides of the same coin. A part of the populace believes that few have an inborn understanding of certain skills in sectors such as arts or athletics. However, others opine that children can be imbibed with the know-how to become a great athlete or artist.
On one hand, people believe that people are born with gifts such as creativity and technical knowledge in their craft such as music or sport. This could be due to the sheer brilliance that some of the great achievers have showcased in their respective sectors. It could also be attributed to the fact that they have been consistent in accumulating several accolades over a period of time.
On the other hand, many people around the globe have attained immense success because of extreme hard work put in by them and their mentors. It has also been noticed that these individuals put in have rigorously invested a large amount of time to understand and assimilate the intricacies of their field. Their dedication and motivation have transformed them into immaculate and aggressive players who quickly grasp the nuances of their passion.
In my opinion, the best in the fields are not always born a star with talents. Some people are coached to sharpen their already existing skills whereas others were tutored to work harder to use their passion to achieve an excellent skill level. For instance, it has also been seen in multiple areas, at multiple occasions that a hardworking musician is more revered and well-known that a purely gifted one.
In conclusion, talent and hard work are not mutually exclusive. On the surface, it would seem as though having an innate talent is the only factor to achieve success and reach the top of their field. However, even the gifted need to achieve incredible mastery of their gift.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-26 | Sasuke0789 | 78 | view |
- Although you have never formally studied computing, you have always been interested in computers. You have just read about a computer course that really interests you, but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course. Write a letter to th 78
- You have been doing some voluntary work to help your local community. However, now you are unable to continue doing this work. Write a letter to the manager of the organization where you have been working. In your letter:describe the work you have been do 78
- It is often said that government spends too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable for them. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both places? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...uld be due to the sheer brilliance that some of the great achievers have showcased in their...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n accumulating several accolades over a period of time. On the other hand, many people ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93527508091 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53081468876 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9225174096 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188651755742 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626787576702 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504814873596 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102192760758 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146612016525 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.