The graph below shows average carbon dioxide
The line chart depicts the amount of carbon dioxide released by each person in four countries including UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
In general, it can be seen that while Italy and Portugal witnessed a steady increase in the quantity of carbon dioxide emissions, there was a gradual decline in the volume of this substance released by British and Swedish people during the 40-year period.
Despite sharing a consistent increase throughout the time mentioned, the amount of carbon dioxide discharged per person differed significantly between Italy and Portugal. The figure in Italy rose tediously from nearly 4.2 in 1967 to about 7.8 metric tonnes in 2007 whereas this number in Portugal went up remarkably from 1.6 to around 5.2 metric tonnes during the same period.
Regarding the United Kingdom, in spite of the sharp decline from nearly 11 metric tonnes in 1967 to 8.8 metric tonnes in 2007, it still remained the leading country in carbon emissions in comparison with the three remaining states. Meanwhile, in Sweden, the figure had reached its peak at 10.2 metric tonnes in 1977 before falling substantially and was equal to that of Portugal with 5.2 metric tonnes in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the number of visitors 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtugal with 5.2 metric tonnes in 2007.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, still, whereas, while, in general, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10050251256 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48606124068 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.5746476519 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.166666667 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0933242351942 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569410274253 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464943680139 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705052584055 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305413337483 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.